The Regulation on the transparency and targeting of political advertising will mainly start to apply on 10 October 2025. The purpose of the Regulation is to ensure that political advertising is carried out in a way that enables citizens to understand who is trying to influence their political opinions, how, and with what resources. The Media Freedom Act, on the other hand, seeks to increase transparency regarding advertising by public authorities and other public entities. The Media Freedom Act entered into application on 8 August 2025.
This blog introduces the main obligations laid down in these legislative acts, particularly from the perspective of advertising publishers, such as media companies, and advertising service providers, such as advertising agencies.
Main Obligations for Publishers and Advertising Service Providers
The Regulation on the transparency and targeting of political advertising defines political advertising broadly. It covers not only advertising paid for by political parties and candidates, but also other advertising that seeks to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, voting behaviour, or a legislative or regulatory process. The media sector has worked to ensure that the current situation is largely maintained – meaning that editorial content and advertising addressing social issues remain clearly outside the scope and supervision of the Regulation.
In the context of political advertising transparency, two groups of actors play a particularly important role: publishers of political advertising and providers of political advertising services. A publisher of political advertising is an entity that provides the space, platform, or channel for presenting a political advertisement to the public, such as a media company. A provider of political advertising services, in turn, refers to an entity that designs, implements, or otherwise enables political advertising, such as an advertising agency or a company offering digital advertising technology.
The obligations of service providers relate in particular to the planning, financing, and targeting of political advertising. The Regulation requires service providers to document all relevant information concerning the organisation of a campaign. This includes the sources of funding, the objectives of the advertising, the definition of target audiences, and the technical solutions used for targeting. The service provider must provide this information to the publisher so that the advertisement can be approved in accordance with the Regulation.
The responsibilities of publishers are multi-layered. Publishers must ensure that each political advertisement contains the transparency label required under the Regulation. This means that the advertisement must clearly and immediately indicate its sponsor, the nature and duration of the campaign, and information on any targeting used. The advertisement must also clearly indicate where a more detailed transparency notice is available. This notice may be made accessible, for example, through a link or a QR code included in the advertisement.
To enable the publication of the transparency label and transparency notice, both publishers and service providers must, through contractual arrangements, ensure that they receive from the advertiser accurate information on, among other things, the sponsors of the political advertisement and their backgrounds, as well as the election, referendum, or legislative or regulatory process to which the political advertisement relates. In addition, they must keep records of the amounts received from each source in connection with political advertising. Publishers and service providers must retain this information for at least seven years after the end of the campaign so that authorities can later review and assess compliance with the Regulation.
Publishers must also report all political online advertisements they have published, together with the transparency information required by the Regulation, to a European register. They must also include in their annual reports aggregated, campaign-specific data concerning the monetary amounts or other benefits received as full or partial compensation for services provided, including the use of targeting and ad display technologies.
Targeting of Political Advertising
A significant part of the new Regulation concerns the targeting of advertising. The Regulation prohibits the targeting of political advertising based on sensitive personal data (special categories of personal data under the EU General Data Protection Regulation), such as political opinions, religious beliefs, or ethnic origin. If targeting is based on other, so-called ordinary personal data, such as age, gender, or geographical location, it is permitted only if the personal data has been collected directly from the individual and the individual has given explicit consent for the processing of personal data specifically for political advertising purposes.
The targeting of political advertising requires data controllers to undertake more extensive documentation obligations than those set out in the GDPR. The controller must, among other things, prepare an annual risk assessment and approve, implement, and make publicly available internal policies describing how targeting techniques are used. The controller must also keep records of the use of such techniques, including the mechanisms and parameters applied. Each targeted political advertisement must include, in connection with the transparency label, additional information enabling individuals to understand the logic and key parameters of the targeting techniques used. The new obligations will require digital advertising operators to develop new processes and technical solutions to manage and ensure the traceability of targeting logic.
Advertising by Public Authorities and Public Entities
Under the Media Freedom Act, public authorities and public entities must make publicly available, in electronic and user-friendly form, annual information on their public expenditure related to state advertising. The definition of a public authority or public entity can be considered to include government ministries, state agencies and institutions, state enterprises, and off-budget state funds. The definition also covers state-owned companies where the board has decisive control. Based on the wording of the Act, the definition would also include cities and municipalities, joint municipal authorities, wellbeing regions and joint wellbeing authorities, as well as their subsidiaries and enterprises, and municipal or wellbeing-region-owned entities where the public body has decisive control.
These categories cover dozens of different actors, and media companies therefore face the challenge of identifying all entities covered by the Regulation so that they can inform users of their online services about the annual total amount of public funds received for state advertising and the annual total amount of advertising revenue received from public authorities or public entities in third countries. In addition to publishing this information on their own websites, media companies must also report it to the media services ownership database maintained by Traficom.
In Finland, information on state advertising will be collected in a procurement information repository maintained by the State Treasury, using purchase invoice data from public authorities and public entities. As a result, information such as the amount of advertising purchased by each authority or public entity from each service provider will be openly and publicly available from this repository. This means that individual authorities or other public entities will not have to publish their own information on advertising and announcement expenditure, and media companies will, in turn, be able to more easily verify whether an advertiser qualifies as a public authority or entity under the Media Freedom Act.
Conclusion
While the objectives of strengthening democracy and increasing transparency in advertising are highly commendable, the media sector has expressed criticism of the new regulation. The concern is that the new rules may make the publication of election or state advertising unprofitable for media companies due to extensive information obligations, a heavy administrative burden, and the risk of sanctions. If this happens, the regulation could have unintended effects on the visibility of elections, voter participation, the functioning of democracy, and the operating conditions of advertising-funded media.
Due to these new obligations, global digital giants such as Google and Meta have already announced that they will not participate in political advertising (Xandr/Microsoft had withdrawn earlier). It remains to be seen whether election advertising will shift from their platforms to domestic media, or whether voters will increasingly receive election-related information (or mis/disinformation) and advertising through platforms such as TikTok or X, even though both have formally banned political advertising on their platforms. According to a report by Faktabaari and CheckFirst, TikTok promoted misogynistic content and reinforced stereotypes in Finland during the 2024 European elections, while X has allegedly used data relating to political opinions or religious beliefs for political microtargeting – precisely the issues the new Regulation seeks to address.
The shift of political display advertising to domestic media is further complicated by the fact that most Finnish publishers use Microsoft’s or Google’s advertising management systems, and the cookie consent mechanisms currently based on IAB Europe’s Transparency & Consent Framework (TCF) do not support the collection of explicit consent required under the Regulation. It is clear that the decisions of global digital companies – and regulation designed primarily to address problems occurring on global digital platforms – will also have significant implications for domestic media.
At Folks, we are happy to help interpret the complexities of the new regulation as well as identify the opportunities it may bring.
Anna Paimela
Osakas
+358 40 1648626
If you would like to receive our articles directly by email, subscribe to the Folks newsletter here.
A lawyer’s work has always been shaped by change. Laws are reformed, society evolves and new phenomena challenge old ways of thinking. Rarely, however, has change felt as rapid or as fundamental as it does now. AI and digital tools have entered the everyday life of lawyers and are transforming the foundations of how work is done. They are no longer distant visions, but concrete instruments that are reshaping the whole profession.
AI can process vast amounts of information, find the relevant passages in documents, run case-law searches in seconds and spot risks that would otherwise require laborious analysis. Inevitably, this shifts the skill set expected of lawyers. Going forward we will need even more curiosity and the courage to experiment, together with the ability to ask what a technology means for the client and what it means for the entire sector. A lawyer who stays genuinely interested in the world and its development will be best placed to serve the client. In this moment, adaptability is one of a lawyer’s most essential skills.
Although AI speeds up and sharpens parts of the work, it does not remove the lawyer’s responsibility to think critically or to say out loud when the machine’s answer is not enough. When routines are handled by technology, it becomes clearer where a lawyer’s true strength lies, in interaction, judgement, context and choices. As the technical work accelerates, clients also see more clearly why they want to trust the lawyer who listens, asks questions and understands their situation as a whole.
Legal services are built on trust, and personal interaction sits at the heart of that trust. A client will not always come to the table with a precise question, sometimes they arrive with uncertainty, concern or pressure. The lawyer’s task then goes beyond analysing facts, it is about listening, framing the right questions and reflecting options. A good lawyer can see and articulate the bigger picture behind the client’s situation and help them move forward. That sparring is often just as important as the final legal solution. When a client feels heard, and feels their situation has been understood from their perspective, they gain confidence even when the answers are not simple. That experience does not arise from algorithmic output, it comes from a present human being.
Adaptability is linked to presence. Lawyers must recognise in their work that the law does not operate in a vacuum, it is always connected to the client’s daily reality, strategic goals and decisions. This is why a lawyer has to see not only what the law says, but how it touches the client’s business and what risks and opportunities it brings with it. Often this calls for sensitivity to the client’s needs, concerns and objectives and the ability to tailor legal advice accordingly. That sensitivity does not exist without human encounters.
Because encounters are the core of our work and the best way to build trust, in September we hosted Folks’ 10th anniversary celebration. Over the evening there were real conversations and moments where clients and colleagues shared experiences and views, paused to listen and felt heard themselves. The warm messages we received afterwards reinforced our feeling that we had succeeded in celebrating what makes this work meaningful, connection and encounters. We hope the photos convey that feeling to you as well.
If you’d like to receive our articles directly in your email, subscribe to the Folks newsletter here.
Bite-sized legal advice for the pixel-sized revolution
Distance Technologies is a Finnish deep tech start-up pioneering the world’s first true glasses-free mixed reality solution. Immediately after its establishment, the company attracted international interest and significant investments from investors such as Google Ventures, Maki.vc and FOV Ventures. Talouselämä, the largest weekly business magazine in the Nordics, also named Distance as one of Finland's most interesting start-ups.
The founders of Distance are not first-timers when it comes to establishing startups. Urho Konttori, the CEO of Distance and Jussi Mäkinen, the CMO of Distance, among other current founders of Distance were also founders in Varjo. Experience from startups has played a role in the speed the company has grown but also in the way the founding team understood the value of effectively managing legal affairs.
The company’s rapid growth and unique technology required a strong legal foundation from the very beginning. Konttori explains:
"Our technology is completely new, and to even open discussions with potential investors and contractual parties, we had to consider the legal matters carefully from day one. Folks' team has been involved from the beginning to ensure that all the legal pieces are in place."
Efficiency through weekly check-ins
Folks has been Distance’s legal partner since the company's incorporation. Folks’ team has drafted the founding documentation and assisted Distance in financing rounds: first, in the pre-seed funding led by Maki.vc and FOV Ventures, and secondly, in the EUR 10 million investment round led by Google Ventures marking its first investment in a Finnish company. In addition, Folks has provided daily legal support for Distance in various legal matters. Konttori describes the partnership as follows:
”Our cooperation has evolved on the basis of our needs. We’ve formulated a habit of going through governance and daily legal matters in our weekly status meeting with Folks. I find these weekly check-ins especially useful for a start-up which has to juggle multiple tasks, including challenging legal tasks, simultaneously. If there is one tip I would give to any start-up it is to adopt this model as it enables the company to identify potential legal risks and manage them effectively without sending lengthy emails back and forth."
Legal partnership enables Distance to focus on development
Distance has quickly emerged as one of Finland's most promising technology companies. Talouselämä's recognition as Finland's most interesting start-up shows that the company has managed to inspire confidence among investors and markets alike. Distance also recently announced a partnership with Patria, where Patria and Distance will create a unique solution designed for real-time tactical situations and utilizing the patented Distance XR light field and digital optics technology to achieve unprecedented situational awareness combined with exceptional low-light visual acuity.
Folks' ongoing legal support ensures that the company can focus on development without unnecessary delays. In the technology sector, the business environment is changing rapidly, so a partner needs to understand not only the contracts and financing patterns, but also the dynamics of the industry as a whole. Especially when the business is evolving fast, legal support needs to be accessible and practical.
Distance’s CMO Jussi Mäkinen sees collaboration as a clear competitive advantage:
"We need to be able to focus on what we are best at. Folks makes collaboration easy and ensures that legal issues do not distract from growth and development. Their advice is practical, to the point and delivered promptly. That's exactly what a technology company needs from its legal partner."
Distance Technologies is a Finnish deep tech startup founded in 2024 that develops fully eye- and headset-free augmented reality solutions. Its revolutionary technology turns, for example, a car windscreen into an interactive experience without the need for traditional display devices. The innovation uses light field technology to bring a three-dimensional image into the user's field of vision without the need for separate glasses or headgear. The company has quickly attracted international interest, and its development has been supported by major investors such as Google Ventures.
Read more about Distance from their website: https://distance.tech
Legal partner for the tech industry
Folks has proven track-record in providing legal services for technology companies at all stages: from start-ups to established players, tailored to the appropriate stage of their business. The legal aspects of the IT and technology sector require an understanding not only of contracts and financing, but also of business development and future scalability. If you want advice in legal issues, such as financing, corporate structure, contracts, GDPR, protecting your brand and ideas or retaining the people who are vital to your business, backed up by strong business acumen, then we are your folks.